AP Biology class blog for discussing current research in Biology

Author: alexoskeleton

Where did all the right whales go?

Marine biology researchers have recently mapped the density of one of the most endangered whale species in the entire world: the North Atlantic right whale. The researchers used newly analyzed data to help predict and avoid whales’ harmful, and sometimes fatal, exposure to commercial fishermen and vessel strikes.

At Duke University, the Marine Geospatial Ecology lab led a group of 11 institutions in the United States that gather 17 years of visual survey data that covers 9.7 million square kilometers of the Atlantic Ocean. The information that was gathered was put together with data from around 500 hydrophone recorders in Atlantic Ocean waters that recorded whales’ calls.

Researchers created a statistical model to calculate the number of whales per square kilometer at different locations in time. The researchers did this by lining up visual and acoustic datasets. The director of Duke’s Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Patrick Halpin, states that “The more accurate and detailed the mapping, the better chance we have to save dwindling numbers of right whales from preventable injury and fatality.”

Southern right whale.jpg

This laboratory focuses on studying marine ecology, resource management, and ocean conservation. They achieve this by utilizing data to inform ocean management and governance decisions.

Current efforts to track and protect whales from harmful encounters with human activities have been incomplete or ineffective. Electronic tagging, a method used for monitoring, can be detrimental to whale health. Additionally, it is not practical to continuously monitor more than a small portion of the whale population using this method.

A statistical model, revised from a 2016 version, predicts whale density based on environmental factors such as sea surface temperature. The updated model incorporates new data on whale migration and feeding patterns, including their presence in unprotected areas.

Jason Roberts, a Duke research associate and the study’s lead author, noted, “With nearly three times more aerial survey data than before, and supporting evidence from hydrophones, we were able to demonstrate how significantly the population has shifted its distribution.”

Right whales play a crucial role in maintaining the health and balance of marine environments and the entire food web through their feeding habits. However, as climate change affects the population of their prey, whale migration patterns have become more unpredictable. This increases the risk of harm to whales from activities such as commercial fishing, impacting their health and reproductive success.

Researchers can now more accurately predict whale density along the U.S. East Coast using maps obtained from satellite ocean monitoring or physical ocean models like the recently published one.

In AP Biology, we previously learned about ecology. We recently came back from the Bronx Zoo and saw how many animals on our planet are endangered. The scientists in this article use ecological data to understand and protect endangered species. This article relates to the population of an organisms. The article examines the factors that affect the abundance and distribution of the right whale.

It is incredible to really think about how researchers are combining visual survey data and acoustic recordings to estimate the number of whales in a given area. This kind of mapping not only helps us understand the whales’ behavior and migration patterns but also plays a crucial role in their conversation. I would love to hear what you think. Do you think that these efforts will help save the right whales from extinction?


Almost 200 new kinds of CRISPR systems were Revealed by Search Algorithms

Researchers at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) have developed a groundbreaking algorithm to efficiently explore large microbial sequence databases in search of rare CRISPR systems. These systems, found in diverse bact®eria from environments like coal mines, breweries, and Antarctic lakes, could offer new opportunities in biotechnology.

CRISPR, is a revolutionary technology that allows scientists to edit genes with. Originally discovered as a part of the bacterial immune system, CRISPR has been adapted for use in gene editing in a wide range of organisms. The technology works by using a small piece of RNA to guide an enzyme (often Cas9) to a specific location in the genome, where it can make precise cuts in the DNA. These cuts can then be used to disable a gene, repair a faulty gene, or introduce a new gene. CRISPR has many potential applications, including treating genetic disorders, creating genetically modified organisms, and studying gene function.

CRISPR illustration gif animation 1.gif

The algorithm, called Fast Locality-Sensitive Hashing-based clustering (FLSHclust), uses advanced big-data clustering techniques to rapidly sift through massive genomic datasets. It identified 188 new types of rare CRISPR systems, highlighting the remarkable diversity and potential of these systems.

CRISPR systems are part of bacterial defense mechanisms and have been adapted for genome editing and diagnostics. The new algorithm, created by Professor Feng Zhang’s lab, allowed researchers to analyze billions of protein and DNA sequences from public databases in weeks, a task that would have taken months with traditional methods.

The study revealed new variants of Type I CRISPR systems with longer guide RNAs, potentially offering more precise gene-editing tools with fewer off-target effects. Some of these systems could edit DNA in human cells and may be deliverable using existing gene-delivery technologies. Additionally, the researchers discovered Type IV and VII systems with new mechanisms of action that could be used for RNA editing or as molecular recording tools.

The researchers emphasize the importance of expanding sampling diversity to uncover more rare systems, as many of the newly discovered systems were found in unusual bacteria from specific environments.

This research shows the power of advanced algorithms in uncovering the vast functional diversity of CRISPR systems, paving the way for new biotechnological applications. The findings could lead to the development of novel CRISPR-based tools for genome editing, diagnostics, and molecular recording, with potential applications in medicine, agriculture, and environmental science.

In AP Biology, we learned molecular genetics. We learned the structure and function of DNA, gene expression, and genetic variation. CRISPR-Cas9 provides a real-world example of how these concepts are applied in biotechnology. It genetics we are taught that genes can only be passed down from generation to generation and can not be artificially altered. CRISPR technology goes against what we have learned. It teaches us that we can change the genes and DNA of organisms. We can learn about how CRISPR. is used to edit genes in model organisms like  fruit flies to study gene function. We can also use it to study its potential applications in agriculture to create crops with desired traits or in medicine to treat genetic disorders.

When I heard about CRISPR I immediately thought about the ethical concerns regarding the technology. What are the bad things about this technology? What if countries want to create super humans or weapons of mass destruction with CRISPR? This new technology raises many concerns. I definitely feel that this technology needs to be regulated and that only a select few are allowed to use it and experiment with it. What do you think?

How A Lion’s Meal Has Changed Due To An Invasive Ant

In a recent study conducted by wildlife ecologist Jake Goheen and his colleagues at the University of Wyoming and the Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya, the intricate connections within the African savanna’s ecosystem were unveiled. The research focused on the impact of the invasion of big-headed ants (Pheidole megacephala) on the food web, leading to unexpected consequences for the top predator, lions.

Lions Family Portrait Masai Mara.jpg

Pheidole megacephala commonly known as the big-headed ant, is a globally distributed species recognized for its distinctive characteristics. This ant species exhibits a striking size polymorphism within its colonies, featuring major workers with disproportionately large heads compared to their minor counterparts. This adaptation allows for specialization in various tasks within the colony, with major workers often taking on roles such as defense and foraging. Invasive populations of these ants can outcompete and displace native ant species, altering local ecosystems. Known for their adaptability, Pheidole megacephala colonies can thrive in diverse habitats, from urban areas to forests. Researchers study this species to understand its behavior and biology, aiding in the development of effective management strategies to mitigate its impact on ecosystems where it has become invasive.

The invasion of big-headed ants resulted in the demise of native acacia ants (genus Crematogaster), which played a crucial role in defending whistling thorn trees against hungry elephants. Normally, these acacia ants would swarm up inside an elephant’s nostrils and deter them from damaging the thorn trees. However, with the invasion eliminating these defenders, elephants freely ravaged the thorn trees, transforming the landscape by opening up the grassland.

This alteration in the environment had a cascading effect on the lions’ hunting behavior. The reduction in tree cover made it challenging for lions to pursue their preferred prey, zebras. Instead, the lions shifted their focus to buffalo, a riskier but more accessible target in the changed terrain.

To understand the extent of these changes, the researchers tracked lionesses in the region, collaring them to monitor their activities and kills. They also established experimental plots to observe areas invaded by big-headed ants compared to those where native ants still thrived.

The findings revealed a significant increase in visibility in areas affected by big-headed ants. Lions in these open spaces had a higher chance of spotting prey from a distance. Consequently, the success rate of lion kills on zebras declined when visibility increased.

Over the three-year study period, the lionesses’ diet underwent a transformation. Zebra kills dropped from 67 percent to 42 percent, while buffalo kills rose from zero to 42 percent. Despite the change in prey, the lions faced new challenges, as buffalos are formidable opponents and hunting them posed a greater risk of injury.

This study emphasizes the interconnectedness of species in an ecosystem and highlights the far-reaching consequences of disrupting even seemingly insignificant mutual relationships. It serves as a reminder for ecologists to explore similar relationships in different ecosystems, as the consequences of such disruptions can be unexpected and indirect, ultimately influencing the balance of entire communities.

After studying ecology in AP Biology, I learned how devastating a alter in the food chain/web can be. I learned how interconnected ecosystems are, with each species playing a crucial role in maintaining balance. The concept of trophic levels and the intricate web of energy transfer underscored the importance of even the smallest organisms. The introduction of invasive species, such as Pheidole megacephala, can disrupt these ecological dynamics. Observing the consequences of these disruptions, especially through altered food chains, highlighted the cascading effects on biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Understanding the interconnectedness of species in an ecosystem emphasized the need for conservation efforts and sustainable practices. The lessons from studying ecology in AP Biology not only deepened my appreciation for the complexity of nature but also underscored the responsibility we have in preserving and respecting the delicate balance that sustains life on Earth.

I personally believe that we must take more precautions when traveling to foreign places. I remember when I was in the Galapagos Islands with the school; there were checkpoints at each island and at the airport where they would search your bag for species. You couldn’t even bring a single rock to a different island! As a society, we should take more precautions like these to prevent further damage to ecosystems. We must take care of the places that we stand on. What do you think?





Individual Cells Move Differently When They Are Together

In a groundbreaking study, researchers have unveiled that a protein crucial for powering movement in individual cells operates distinctly when cells collaborate in groups. Cells engage in intricate pushing and pulling interactions with each other and surrounding tissues during processes such as embryonic organ formation, wound healing, pathogen pursuit, and cancer dissemination. The investigation, led by researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, focused on a cluster of 140 cells known as the primordium, observing how these cells generate forces while adhering to each other during movement in zebrafish embryos—a model organism highly valued for its transparency and shared cellular mechanisms with humans.

The study reveals the role of a protein called RhoA, a primary structured protein, in propelling the group forward during embryonic development. As cells strive to move, they extend protrusions and utilize them to anchor onto nearby tissues before retracting them, a process analogized to the casting out and hauling in of an anchor.

Blood Anemia.jpg

In AP Biology, delving into the intricacies of the RhoA protein offers a compelling view of the relationship between structure and function in molecular biology. The distinct domains within RhoA, such as the GTPase domain, Switch I and II regions, insert region, and C-terminal hypervariable region, serve as structural modules that underpin its role as a molecular switch in cellular signaling. The GTPase domain’s proficiency in binding and hydrolyzing GTP is pivotal, causing RhoA’s influence on the cytoskeleton and, consequently, cellular processes like shape modulation, adhesion, and motility. The activation and inactivation, regulated by proteins like guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), displays these cell signaling pathways. RhoA’s dysregulation is a key player in diseases, displaying its integral contribution to maintaining cellular homeostasis. RhoA protein is a monomeric protein, meaning it does not have a quaternary structure.

Senior study author Holger Knaut, PhD, an associate professor in the Department of Cell Biology at NYU Langone Health, expressed surprise at the finding, stating, “This finding surprised us because we had no reason to suspect that the RhoA machinery required to move groups of cells would be different from that used by single cells.”

Prior research had indicated that single cells move forward by activating RhoA at their rear ends, initiating a process involving the motor protein non-muscle myosin II, resulting in cell constriction and detachment from the underlying surface.

Contrary to this, the current study revealed that cells in the primordium activate RhoA in pulses at the front of the cells, where it performs a dual role. At the front tip, RhoA stimulates the outward growth of the cell skeleton (actin meshwork), forming protrusions that grip the surface. Simultaneously, at the base of these protrusions, RhoA triggers non-muscle myosin II to pull on the actin meshwork, retracting the protrusions. This coordinated action propels the cell group forward, akin to the movement of a banana slug along the ground.

Dr. Knaut emphasized, “Our findings suggest that RhoA-induced actin flow on the basal sides of cells constitutes the motor that pulls the primordium forward, a scenario that likely underlies the movement of many cell groups.” He added that while the machinery suggests similarities in the movement of single cells and cell groups, RhoA contributes differently in each case.

Dr. Knaut also noted that a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which cell groups move holds potential in halting the spread of cancer. He remarked, “The machinery suggests that the movement of single cells and groups of cells is similar, but that RhoA contributes to that machinery differently in each case. Within moving cell groups, RhoA generates actin flow directed toward the rear to propel the group forward.” The study’s findings could guide the design of treatments aiming to block the action of proteins implicated in the spread of cancer.

I personally never knew, especially before taking AP Biology, that cells move together. I did know that they always work together, but not necessarily that they coordinate their movements as a collective entity. It’s fascinating to learn about the intricate processes that govern cellular behavior.

I’ve been particularly intrigued by the role of proteins in these cellular functions. For instance, considering the RhoA protein, what would happen if it misfolded or denatured within our bodies? How would our body react to such a disruption? My assumption is that the consequences could be severe, possibly even leading to a breakdown in essential cellular activities. Could it be so detrimental that it might result in death? I’m curious to hear your thoughts on this matter.

I’ve been contemplating the impact of extreme heat on protein structure. If the RhoA protein were to misfold or denature due to high temperatures, it seems logical that our cells might struggle to move effectively within the body. The idea that external factors like heat could influence such fundamental cellular processes is both intriguing and concerning.

I’m curious about the specific gene responsible for coding the RhoA protein. Are there any specific diseases associated with mutations in this gene? It seems like understanding the genetic aspect could provide further insights into potential health implications.



What Are The Current COVID-19 Variants in November 2023?

In the United States, there are currently more than 10,374 patients hospitalized per week who tested positive for COVID-19. 15% of these patients are in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit). As of November 4, the test positivity rate is 8.5%. When the test positivity is above 5%, this indicates that transmission is considered uncontrolled.

Due to the fact that many people are using home tests that are not reported through public health or are not testing at all, the official case counts underestimate the actual prevalence of COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 without background.png

The dominant variant nationwide currently is HV.1, with 29% of cases, followed by EG.5, with 21.7% of cases and FL.1.5.1, with 9.3% of cases. HV.1 was documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in low numbers during the summer. However, now that the strain has the highest prevalence of any, it claims responsibility for more than a quarter of new coronavirus cases in the U.S. as of late October.

This strain is still a sub-variant of omicron, as is every strain that is in circulation. This strain is a descendant of EG.5, which is the second most common variant in the U.S.

HV.1 is highly infections. The emergence of HV.1 shows how the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, is able to mutate and cause new, highly transmissible variants. The symptoms of HV.1 are very similar to those caused by recent variants of omicron.

Omicron S exhibits a heightened dependence on a significantly elevated level of host receptor ACE2 for effective membrane fusion compared to other variants. This characteristic may elucidate its unanticipated cellular tropism. The mutations not only reshape the antigenic configuration of the N-terminal domain of the S protein but also modify the surface of the receptor-binding domain in a manner distinct from other variants. This alteration aligns with its notable resilience against neutralizing antibodies. These findings imply that Omicron S has developed an exceptional capacity to elude host immunity through an abundance of mutations, albeit at the cost of compromising its fusogenic ability.

The Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus introduces a distinctive challenge to the immune response system, primarily through mutations in the spike protein. These alterations in the antigenic configuration of the spike protein have raised concerns about the potential impact on the effectiveness of the immune response, particularly with regards to neutralizing antibodies generated from prior infections or vaccinations. The unique genetic makeup of Omicron may allow the virus to partially evade recognition by existing antibodies, potentially leading to breakthrough infections. Moreover, the variant’s influence on cellular immunity, mediated by T cells, is still under investigation, but T cell responses may play a crucial role in controlling infections even if antibody responses are compromised. The evolving nature of the virus underscores the importance of public health measures, including vaccination campaigns and booster shots, to adapt to the changing landscape of the pandemic and reinforce the immune system’s ability to respond to new variants like Omicron. Ongoing research is essential to comprehensively understand the implications of Omicron on the immune response and to inform effective strategies for mitigating its impact on public health.

Omicron stands out with approximately 50 mutations, surpassing the mutation count of any prior SARS-CoV-2 variant. Among these, 32 alterations are within the spike protein, the primary target for most vaccines aiming to neutralize the virus. As of December 2021, numerous mutations in Omicron were novel and distinct from those observed in earlier variants. By April 2022, the variant exhibited 30 amino acid changes, three small deletions, and one small insertion in the spike protein when compared to the original virus. Notably, 15 of these changes were situated in the receptor-binding domain (residues 319–541). As of December 2022, the virus featured additional modifications and deletions in various genomic regions. For instance, three mutations at the furin cleavage site, crucial for its transmission, were identified.

Health officials are not concerned with the latest variant. This is because it appears that HV.1 is very similar to EG.5, also known as “eris.” They are so similar that the World Health Organization (WHO) does not separate the two in its estimates. Globally, Eris is the most prominent strain, accounting for 46% of global cases as of late October, according to the WHO. This estimate also includes cases from HV.1 and another similar strain, HK.5.

HV.1 does not appear to cause more severe illnesses. However, it is expected that it brings the same high transmissibility that eris has. More cases will cause more variants with more mutations to occur.

Dr. Perry N. Halkitis, the dean of Rutgers School of Public Health, says that “the concern about the multitude of mutations is that it is likely and possible that there are versions of the virus that will be more evasive to the immunity that people have.”

However, the fact that HV.1 is so similar to EG.5, the updated coronavirus vaccines are expected to work on the new strain.

However, the shots’ advantages are limited by low uptake so far. Only about 7% of U.S. adults and 2% of children got the new COVID-19 vaccines during the first month it was available, according to national surveys. Despite the rollout being hampered by availability and insurance issues, U.S. health officials say those problems have been mostly resolved.

Surveys also found that almost 38% of adults and parents said that they probably or definitely will not get the shot for themselves or their children.

Hesitancy and vaccine fatigue are surely large parts of the uptake problem. When it comes to COVID-19, there is a general lack of urgency now that vaccines and treatment are widely available.

Halkitis says, “we’ve opened a window of opportunity for people who are resistant to vaccination to begin with to say, ‘Well, it doesn’t look so bad anymore, so I’m just going to bypass it.’ Just like how they react to the flu.”

According to CDC data, COVID-19 weekly hospital admissions have been decreasing or stagnant for nearly two months. However, these numbers remain elevated at more than 15,700 new admissions for the last full week in October, more than double summer’s low of about 6,300 in June.

With the upcoming cold winter months approaching, scientists are anticipating more COVID-19 infections as cold temperatures push people indoors.

Halkitis says that, “I expect there to be more rapid spread as is the case with any respiratory virus in the winter months.”

The CDC is predicting that a moderate COVID-19 wave will sweep over the U.S. according to its respiratory disease season outlook.

The CDC said in an update to its respiratory disease season outlook published last month that, “COVID-19 variants continue to emerge but have not resulted in rapid disease surges. We continue to anticipate a moderate COVID-19 wave, causing around as many hospitalizations at the peak as occurred at last winter’s peak.”

Scientists anticipate that the variants circulating in the U.S. will continue to change as the virus spreads and adapts to its environment.

Halkitis says, “The more we spread it to each other, the more it’s going to keep replicating in people’s bodies, the more likely it will be that mutations are going to occur.”

Based on these findings, I am not very concerned about COVID-19 mutations and variants. Having recently received the COVID-19 booster, I feel great and confident in the effectiveness of the vaccination. In my view, the pandemic no longer appears to be a national emergency. What are your thoughts on this? Do you believe the government should continue to declare the U.S. in a state of emergency due to COVID-19?

Personally, I commend the government for its handling of the pandemic. The implementation of vaccination campaigns, testing protocols, and treatment plans has been commendable. The availability of booster shots is a testament to the ongoing efforts to curb the spread of the virus and protect public health. I believe these measures have played a crucial role in mitigating the impact of the virus.

While I acknowledge that COVID-19 mutations and variants are still a consideration, the fact that I feel well after receiving the booster is reassuring. I think it’s essential to strike a balance between vigilance and a sense of normalcy. What’s your perspective on the current state of the pandemic and the government’s response?


Worms Infused with Spider Genes Spin Silk Tougher Than Kevlar

Researchers have achieved a significant milestone in biotechnology by genetically modifying silkworms to produce spider silk. Spider silk is renowned for its exceptional strength and durability, surpassing even the toughness of Kevlar. Justin Jones, a biologist specializing in engineered spider silks at Utah State University, described the material as “a truly high-performance fiber.” This breakthrough has the potential to revolutionize various industries. It could be employed in the production of lightweight yet incredibly strong structural components, thereby enhancing the fuel efficiency of planes and cars. Additionally, this innovation could lead to the development of wound dressings for faster healing and sutures for surgical procedures.

Silkworm cultivation has been practiced for thousands of years, providing raw material for textiles. However, their silks tend to be fragile. On the other hand, spiders face the opposite issue – their silks are remarkably strong and a greener alternative to synthetic fibers, which are produced by using fossil fuels. However, their silks are challenging to cultivate. Silkworms coexist peacefully, while spiders are territorial and tend to be aggressive when in close proximity.

Bombyx mori1.jpg

Over the years, researchers have endeavored to genetically engineer silkworms to produce spider fibers, aiming to harness the desirable qualities of both organisms. The primary challenge has been the size of spider silk proteins, which are significantly larger. Inserting these large genes into the genomes of other animals has proven to be a complex task.

In a recent study, Junpeng Mi, a biotechnologist at Donghua University in Shanghai, China, opted to work with smaller spider silk proteins. Mi and his fellow scientists focused on MiSp, a protein found in Araneus ventricosus, an orb-weaving spider native to East Asia. They utilized CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats), a gene editing tool, to replace the gene in silkworms responsible for their primary silk protein with MiSp. During this process, the scientists retained some silkworm sequences in their MiSp gene construct to ensure compatibility with the worm’s internal machinery.

The MiSp gene itself is 5440 base pairs in size and encodes 1766 amino acids. The protein features repetitive amino acid sequences, which contribute to the unique mechanical properties of spider silk. MiSp also possesses N and C terminal domains, which play specific roles in the assembly and characteristics of the silk protein. The protein exhibits a predominant beta-sheet structure, as opposed to an alpha-helix structure. Beta-sheets are a secondary structure in proteins, characterized by the arrangement of beta-strands connected by hydrogen bonds, resulting in a sheet-like structure.

The beta-sheet structure is a pivotal factor in the exceptional strength and toughness of spider silk. This structure facilitates the formation of crystalline regions within the silk fibers, providing both mechanical stability and properties that render spider silk one of the strongest natural materials known.

The genetically modified silkworms carrying the spider genes produced fibers with remarkable tensile strength and toughness. The resulting fibers were nearly as tough as the strongest natural spider silk and nearly six times stronger than Kevlar.

The flexibility of the MiSp-based fibers surprised the researchers. Typically, this protein produces strong but not stretchy fibers. “But it does make a flexible fiber when you put it in a silkworm,” says Jones.

Spider Silk.jpg

Mi and his team aim to scale up the production of spider silk fibers for commercial use. This involves crossbreeding their specialized silkworms with commercially viable strains commonly used in large-scale silk farming. The resulting biodegradable fibers may initially find application in surgical sutures.

Jones raises concerns regarding safeguarding intellectual property rights during the commercialization process. This is likely to involve the distribution of transgenic silkworm eggs to numerous farmers. There is also uncertainty about whether the introduced genes will persist through subsequent generations of silkworm breeding.

The researchers plan to continue pushing the boundaries of spider silk engineering. They are currently exploring the possibility of modifying silkworms to produce spider silks with enhanced strength and elasticity. Mi and his team envision creating silk proteins that incorporate non-natural amino acids. This offers great potential for producing silks with unique properties. This could allow scientists to create silks that surpass the strength and toughness of materials like Kevlar.

When I first heard about CRISPR and the idea of genetically modifying living organisms, it raised many concerns for me. The notion of creating a material stronger than Kevlar in an organism smaller than my hand heightens my apprehensions. What if foreign countries exploit this technology for military purposes? What if it’s used as a biological weapon by enhancing the virulence or resistance of pathogens? What if terrorist organizations like Hamas employ this technology to further their destructive aims against the Israeli people?

Genetic modification prompts contemplation of numerous ethical concerns it may bring. If I were in a position of governance, I would impose stricter regulations, conduct more extensive long-term studies, and implement transparent labeling for genetically modified organisms. It is imperative to acknowledge that discussions about the ethics of genetic modification are ongoing and may evolve as the technology advances, along with society’s deepening understanding of genetics. Decisions in this realm should consider all potential applications that gene editing offers. Now, I ask you, what are your concerns with this technology? What problems do you think it brings? Personally, I am against this technology, and I believe there should be many legislative laws against it because of its potential impacts in the future.

Genetic modification is a powerful innovation with the potential to revolutionize and, potentially, disrupt our society. It is a tool that demands judicious use, taking into account its ethical and societal implications. Gene editing can be a catalyst for positive transformation in our world, cultivating a future that balances scientific progress with ethical responsibility. Spiders and silkworms represent just the beginning of this new frontier in scientific research.







Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

Skip to toolbar